Subject	BS, a stock TT will walk a 350 in a straight line
Posted by	Zster (Big Red) on November 30, 2004 at 8:35 PM
	This message has been viewed 62 times.
In Reply To	Bull-oney. A stock 350z is only marginally faster than posted by znessnv on November 30, 2004 at 07:07 PM
Message	350 with a track package has better brakes than a stock TT, but driving is up to the driver. Regular 350 has marginal brakes. A little more weight with on the TT but you can use the weight to your advantage. The TT gives much more feedback than a 350. I've driven both back to back at track days, similar mods. I prefer the TT hands down. I can easily rip a 350 a new one if I had a stock TT with some decent brake pads or if I try without. Cheers, Salah Aztec Red 300ZX Twin Turbo
Follow Ups	Is the latest M3 a quicker car than a stock TT? - Honduhman 17:54:12 11/30/04 E46 does 0-60 in 4.6 and 1/4 mile in 13.3 (n/m) - Z32Nizzan 17:58:36 11/30/04 not to mention - Salivate 18:02:23 11/30/04 I'm pretty sure it is. (n/m) - niZfreak (NorCal) 17:59:53 11/30/04 How about road racing? which one is quicker? reason> - MikeVar82 18:06:26 11/30/04 I saw a Scion Xa beat a 350Z on the track. (n/m) - SactoTodd 18:12:09 11/30/04 There is a bit more to that too, eh? ;) (n/m) - Scotts94z32 18:26:49 11/30/04 yeah, there's more - SactoTodd 18:31:47 11/30/04 I have seen a 350Z pull away from a a ferrari F40, - colocomp (Denver) 18:45:20 11/30/04 that's kinda my point. - SactoTodd 18:54:25 11/30/04 dotn forget the guzzler tax (n/m) - Max865(ATL) 19:01:06 11/30/04 amen. (n/m) - trackstar 20:38:34 11/30/04 Was the F40 a) parked, or b) on a trailer? Or were you - znessnv 19:20:42 11/30/04 The F40 driver was not a bad driver, - colocomp (Denver) 19:41:24 11/30/04 How can you say that? The F40 is a twin turbo charged V8 - znessnv 19:47:41 11/30/04 I believe he owns a Ferrari dealership here in Denver - colocomp (Denver) 19:55:45 11/30/04 I guess we are digressing. My only point is that I - znessnv 21:27:01 11/30/04 Try 478 bhp @ 7000 rpm, stock (n/m) - Fast300 00:39:37 12/01/04 true, true, true, and true, but it was also wet/raining. :) (n/m) - Scotts94z32 20:01:22 11/30/04 Does the 200 lbs of lard have a name? (n/m) - ZXtaZTT 07:35:25 12/01/04 M3 vs 350 was with pro drivers (n/m) - MikeVar82 18:28:46 11/30/04 Bull-oney. A stock 350z is only marginally faster than - znessnv 19:07:45 11/30/04 the 350 drivers that couldn't keep up with you need practice (n/m) - SactoTodd 19:11:05 11/30/04 Maybe. Stock 350 didn't seem to corner that well and - znessnv 19:14:39 11/30/04 And the TT's made the 350's look like busses. (n/m) - znessnv 19:11:55 11/30/04 wrong in so many ways, "marginally"? (n/m) - Scotts94z32 20:02:16 11/30/04 BS, a stock TT will walk a 350 in a straight line - Zster (Big Red) 20:35:55 11/30/04 Absolutely (n/m) - znessnv 21:20:35 11/30/04 Most of those car comparison videos are biased toward the - zspec1 19:10:40 11/30/04 2nd (n/m) - Salivate 21:55:04 11/30/04 He was laying back in the first lap or two... - Ashman2k2 19:13:11 11/30/04 In the vid i have he does complain about the stock tires but - MikeVar82 19:22:47 11/30/04 Correction the M3 had the fastest time. s2000=2nd, 350=3rd (n/m) - MikeVar82 19:30:50 11/30/04 truth lies in ALMS standings, not in videos (n/m) - Salivate 21:56:19 11/30/04 lol, thats why i asked a question. not a statment. (n/m) - MikeVar82 11:36:14 12/01/04 yes (n/m) - Tissan© 18:09:57 11/30/04 Yes. The M3 has >Torque than TT(also >HP) (n/m) - NAZTTy 22:25:12 11/30/04
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.